What action should a worker take if verifications are received after a recertification has been denied?

The correct approach in this scenario is to reopen the case when verifications are received after a recertification has been denied. In the context of food and nutrition services, if new documentation is obtained that could potentially affect an applicant's eligibility, it is essential to reassess the case using this new information.

Reopening the case enables the worker to consider the newly received verifications and determine if the denial was justified based on the updated information. Additionally, the process may involve issuing a new decision that reflects the recent verifications, potentially leading to approval if the new evidence supports eligibility.

Using the original date of application is also relevant, as it ensures that the applicant's benefits are processed fairly and consistently, maintaining continuity in how their case is handled. Therefore, reopening the case, issuing a new decision based on updated information, and utilizing the original application date together represent the comprehensive actions a worker should take in response to new verifications after an initial denial.